UEFA has confirmed disciplinary proceedings have been opened
against the Russian Football Federation (RFU) following the crowd trouble that
marred the Euro 2016 game against England.
Flares and fireworks were set off from the
section housing the Russian supporters late in the second half before the
situation became even uglier following Vasili Berezutski’s injury-time
equaliser in the 1-1 draw.
At the final whistle hundreds of Russian
fans broke through a feeble security cordon to attack their England
counterparts who made a hasty retreat towards the exits.
Having received a full report into the
incidents, UEFA on Sunday confirmed charges had been brought against the RFU
for crowd disturbances, racist behaviour and the setting off of fireworks.
The Control, Ethics and Disciplinary Body
will decide Russia’s fate on Tuesday and it could have serious repercussions
for Leonid Slutsky’s side.
Russia were handed a six-point penalty,
suspended for the duration of their Euro 2016 qualifying campaign, following
incidents during the game against the Czech Republic at Euro 2012.
That suspended period has now expired but
UEFA is sure to take a dim view of Saturday’s incidents that were beamed around
the world.
The violence at the Stade Velodrome was a
continuation of the carnage that had seen Marseille turned into a battle zone
for much of Saturday and the two days preceding it as Russian, English and
French supporters waged a running battle through the streets of the city’s Old
Port area.
UEFA condemned the incidents in a statement
but also confirmed it could “only take disciplinary action for incidents which
happen within the stadium perimeter”.
That means England are likely to escape
sanctions.
One security guard working at the Velodrome
told French radio of his helplessness as the Russian fans began their charge.
Speaking to RMC, the unnamed 22-year-old
said: “I do not understand why we mixed Russian and English fans in the
southern section. We had security guards with a rope to keep the two groups
apart.
“It went well throughout the match but we
knew it was going to blow up at the end because there had been skirmishes. We
were not trained to cope with hooligans.
“We did not have the means. We had just our
arms and a rope. The hooligans were ready to do battle.
“We were worried. I saw children being
trampled.
“I do not understand why England came to
play in Marseille, the game could have been put elsewhere.”
After condemning those who indulged in the
violence, UEFA has also admitted there were issues regarding segregation.
A statement read: “UEFA expresses its utter
disgust for the violent clashes that occurred in the city centre of Marseille,
and its serious concern for the incidents at the end of the match inside Stade
Velodrome.
“This kind of behaviour is totally
unacceptable and has no place in football.
“Disciplinary proceedings have been opened
against the Russian Football Union (RFU) for the following events occurring
inside the stadium: crowd disturbances, setting off of fireworks and throwing
of missiles.
“A decision on the sanctions to be imposed
will be made within the next few days, once the RFU has been able to submit
written statements and evidence.
“UEFA acknowledges that there were
segregation issues at Stade Velodrome and will implement corrective measures to
strengthen the deployment of security personnel at stadiums, in close
collaboration with local authorities.”
Russia’s sports minister Vitaly Mutko said
on Sunday he expected a “fine from UEFA” and admitted the country’s supporters
had “behaved incorrectly” having earlier appeared to pin the blame squarely on
the lack of security measures inside the ground.
Speaking straight after the game, he told
R-Sport: “There was no clash, that has been exaggerated. In fact, everything is
fine. When the match ended, there was no barrier between the fans. The British
were upset, of course, but it all quickly dissolved.
“Such matches should be organised properly.
It is necessary to separate the fans.
He added: “The bad thing is there were
firecrackers and flares. There were no nets. One must understand these things.”
0 comments: